The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological report.

نویسندگان

  • Tuhina Neogi
  • Daniel Aletaha
  • Alan J Silman
  • Raymond L Naden
  • David T Felson
  • Rohit Aggarwal
  • Clifton O Bingham
  • Neal S Birnbaum
  • Gerd R Burmester
  • Vivian P Bykerk
  • Marc D Cohen
  • Bernard Combe
  • Karen H Costenbader
  • Maxime Dougados
  • Paul Emery
  • Gianfranco Ferraccioli
  • Johanna M W Hazes
  • Kathryn Hobbs
  • Tom W J Huizinga
  • Arthur Kavanaugh
  • Jonathan Kay
  • Dinesh Khanna
  • Tore K Kvien
  • Timothy Laing
  • Katherine Liao
  • Philip Mease
  • Henri A Ménard
  • Larry W Moreland
  • Raj Nair
  • Theodore Pincus
  • Sarah Ringold
  • Josef S Smolen
  • Ewa Stanislawska-Biernat
  • Deborah Symmons
  • Paul P Tak
  • Katherine S Upchurch
  • Jirí Vencovský
  • Frederick Wolfe
  • Gillian Hawker
چکیده

OBJECTIVE The American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism have developed new classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of Phase 2 of the development process was to achieve expert consensus on the clinical and laboratory variables that should contribute to the final criteria set. METHODS Twenty-four expert RA clinicians (12 from Europe and 12 from North America) participated in Phase 2. A consensus-based decision analysis approach was used to identify factors (and their relative weights) that influence the probability of "developing RA," complemented by data from the Phase 1 study. Patient case scenarios were used to identify and reach consensus on factors important in determining the probability of RA development. Decision analytic software was used to derive the relative weights for each of the factors and their categories, using choice-based conjoint analysis. RESULTS The expert panel agreed that the new classification criteria should be applied to individuals with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis in whom at least 1 joint is deemed by an expert assessor to be swollen, indicating definite synovitis. In this clinical setting, they identified 4 additional criteria as being important: number of joints involved and site of involvement, serologic abnormality, acute-phase response, and duration of symptoms in the involved joints. These criteria were consistent with those identified in the Phase 1 data-driven approach. CONCLUSION The consensus-based, decision analysis approach used in Phase 2 complemented the Phase 1 efforts. The 4 criteria and their relative weights form the basis of the final criteria set.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: methodological report phase I.

OBJECTIVE To apply a data-driven approach to investigate, in patients newly presenting with undifferentiated inflammatory synovitis, key variables that discriminate the subset of patients at sufficiently high risk of persistent or erosive disease for the purpose of developing new criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS In this first phase of the collaborative effort of the American Co...

متن کامل

Fever of Unknown Origin with Polyarthritis

This disease has been defined as systemic arthritis by the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), 2 systemiconset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA) by the American College of Rheumatology Classification, or systemic-onset juvenile chronic arthritis by the European League against Rheumatism classification. Diagnosis o...

متن کامل

Rheumatoid arthritis and tabetic arthropathy: physiopathological link or simple association?

To the best of our knowledge, the association of rheumatoid arthritis and tabetic arthropathy has never been described before in the literature. We report here a first observation. We report the case of a 50-year-old man, treated for syphilitic arthritis evolving for 4 years, who presented with a table of rheumatoid arthritis. The diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis was established according to t...

متن کامل

2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.

OBJECTIVE The 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR; formerly the American Rheumatism Association) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been criticised for their lack of sensitivity in early disease. This work was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for RA. METHODS A joint working group from the ACR and the European League Against Rheumatism developed,...

متن کامل

مقایسه‌ی معیارهای1987 ACR با معیارهای جدید2010 ACR/EULAR در تشخیص بیماری آرتریت روماتویید

Background: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease presenting with inflammation, tenderness and destruction of the synovial joints, resulting in severe disability and early death due to complication of disease. Previous diagnostic criteria are not useful for identifying patients who need early treatment. Thus, new diagnostic criteria for faster diagnosis of disease are intr...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Arthritis and rheumatism

دوره 62 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010